What UFO Disclosure is Up Against

In the realm of subjects, specifically UFOs and paranormal phenomena, a pattern often emerges: as one gets closer to uncovering the truth, the intensity of discrediting and retaliatory efforts seems to escalate. This playbook can be seen unfolding in the video “Spooky Hustlers: How wacky UFO activists and ‘crazy’ ghost hunters duped Congress into hunting UFOs.” This title itself, chosen for its provocative tone, may reflect a broader tactic employed to obscure and discredit potentially significant revelations. As we look into the contents of this video, it’s essential to keep in mind that heightened skepticism and mockery could, paradoxically, be indicators of approaching critical truths.

The video titled “Spooky Hustlers: How wacky UFO activists and ‘crazy’ ghost hunters duped Congress into hunting UFOs”, which premiered on December 21, 2023, by the New York Post.

The narrative presented in this video scrutinizes the current state of UFO and paranormal phenomena acceptance, casting a skeptical and somewhat negative light on the events and individuals involved. This skepticism is evident in the language used throughout the video, with terms such as “controversial,” “misleading,” “flawed,” “misinterpreted,” “unofficial,” “unfunded,” and “exaggerated,” painting a picture of doubt and questioning. The focus on discrepancies, lack of solid empirical evidence, and potential misinformation underlines this stance. The video navigates through various parts of the UFO and paranormal saga, including government programs like AATIP and AAWSAP, the involvement of key figures, and the role of media and physical locations like Skinwalker Ranch. It’s clear from this approach that the narrative aims to challenge the prevailing perceptions and encourages a reevaluation of the claims and stories that have influenced public opinion and government policy in this area.

The title “Spooky Hustlers: How Wacky UFO Activists and ‘Crazy’ Ghost Hunters Duped Congress into Hunting UFOs” is crafted in a way that intentionally casts doubt and ridicule on the subject matter. Let’s break down each part of the title to understand how it achieves this effect:

1. “Spooky Hustlers”:
   • “Spooky” is a term often used in a light-hearted or unserious context, typically associated with things that are superficially eerie or related to Halloween. It minimizes the seriousness of the subject.
   • “Hustlers” suggests deceit or trickery. It implies that those involved are not sincere in their pursuits but are instead motivated by self-interest, perhaps financial gain or notoriety.
2. “How Wacky UFO Activists”:
   • “Wacky” is a derogatory term suggesting irrationality or absurdity. It undermines the credibility of the UFO activists, painting them as not just unconventional but nonsensical.
   • “UFO Activists” frames these individuals as fringe or out of touch with reality, rather than as serious researchers or enthusiasts.
3. “and ‘Crazy’ Ghost Hunters”:
   • The use of ‘crazy’ is a clear indicator of skepticism and mockery. It implies that the ghost hunters are not just enthusiastic or dedicated, but mentally unstable or delusional.
   • “Ghost Hunters” are already a group often viewed with skepticism by the mainstream. Labeling them as ‘crazy’ further marginalizes them and their activities.
4. “Duped Congress into Hunting UFOs”:
   • “Duped” suggests that the UFO activists and ghost hunters successfully deceived or tricked Congress. This implies that Congress, a significant and respected institution, was fooled into taking action on a subject that the title suggests is not worthy of serious consideration.
   • “Hunting UFOs” is a phrase that evokes a sense of wild goose chases or futile endeavors. It portrays the pursuit of UFOs as a misguided or fruitless effort, possibly intended to be more entertaining than scientifically rigorous.

Overall, the title crafts a narrative that is dismissive and mocking of both the individuals involved in UFO and paranormal research and the governmental response to their activism. It uses language that is meant to belittle and question the legitimacy of the subject matter, suggesting that the entire topic is a mix of deception, irrationality, and overreaction. This approach clearly indicates a biased perspective, aiming to muddy the waters on the topic by framing it as unworthy of serious consideration.

The video looks into the controversial story of a group of UFO activists and ghost hunters who influenced the media and the U.S. government to support and fund investigations into paranormal phenomena. It explores various aspects of this saga, including the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) led by Lue Elizondo, the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP), and events and personalities related to Skinwalker Ranch.

The video questions the legitimacy of the UFO and paranormal phenomena stories that have been perpetuated in the media and by certain government officials. It highlights discrepancies in the reporting and funding of these programs, as well as the controversial figures involved in promoting these stories. The narrative suggests that much of the public information about UFOs and paranormal activities has been misleading or false, leading to wasted government resources and public fascination based on potentially flawed or misinterpreted data.

This comprehensive report covers various angles and controversies surrounding the UFO and paranormal narratives in the U.S., including:

• The inception and operation of AATIP and AAWSAP.
• The involvement of key figures like Lue Elizondo, James Lacatski, Harry Reid, and Robert Bigelow.
• The role of media in spreading these stories.
• The physical and financial investments in places like Skinwalker Ranch.
• The broader impact of these narratives on public perception and government policy.

The video serves as a critical examination of how certain stories can gain traction and influence, even at the highest levels of government, without solid empirical evidence, and highlights the need for skepticism and rigorous investigation in such matters.

The video looks deeper into the tangled web surrounding the AAWSAP and AATIP programs and the larger context of UFO phenomena. The video highlights Senator Harry Reid’s significant involvement in the development of these programs, including his contemplation of visiting Skinwalker Ranch, a decision he ultimately avoided to not draw attention. Leslie Kean, a co-author of the influential New York Times article, confessed to purposely focusing on providing UFOs with credibility while intentionally leaving out more controversial aspects such as alleged alien encounters.

The distinction between AAWSAP and AATIP is clarified in the video. What was initially reported as AATIP in the New York Times was, in fact, AAWSAP, with AATIP being a nickname employed by James Lacatski in an effort to gain special access for the program. This revelation points to the misleading information and media manipulation surrounding the original New York Times article, which only covered a small fraction of AAWSAP’s full scope, focusing mainly on UFOs and omitting broader investigations into paranormal phenomena.

According to the video, Lue Elizondo, who claimed to continue UFO-related efforts under the AATIP name after the cessation of AAWSAP, appears to have been engaged in unofficial and unfunded activities rather than a formal program. This storyline has had a substantial influence on Congressional leaders, leading to the creation of a new Pentagon UFO program, the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). The video concludes by urging viewers to reassess the claims made about UFOs and paranormal phenomena, highlighting the necessity for skepticism and thorough investigation. This comprehensive analysis reveals a complex interplay of interests, misinformation, and government involvement in the UFO and paranormal phenomena research, emphasizing the importance of critical thinking and careful scrutiny of information, particularly when it shapes public perception and government policy.

According to the video, in a detailed discussion on Skinwalker Ranch, Greenstreet, a journalist and UFO investigator, expresses his growing skepticism to Nick Pope. Skinwalker Ranch, a 500-acre property in Utah, has been dubbed a “paranormal Disneyland” due to its numerous reports of strange occurrences, including UFO sightings, poltergeist activity, and werewolf-like creatures. The ranch has a long history, previously owned by the Meyers family for decades, who reported no unusual activity. However, when sold to the Sherman family, reports of paranormal phenomena began to surface.

According to the video, Robert Bigelow, a millionaire with interests in UFOs and the paranormal, purchased the ranch from the Shermans. He established the National Institute of Discovery Science (NIDS) to study these phenomena, but despite years of investigation, no conclusive evidence of paranormal activity was found. Notably, key figures in the investigation, including scientists like Hal Puthoff and John Alexander, were involved, but still, no concrete evidence surfaced.

According to the video, The book “Hunt for the Skinwalker” by Colm Kelleher and George Knapp, released in 2005, sensationalized the ranch with stories of werewolves, poltergeists, UFOs, and interdimensional portals, yet offered no solid evidence to support these claims. Frank Salisbury, in his book “The Utah UFO Display,” provided a more grounded perspective, suggesting that many of the ranch’s tales were exaggerated or unfounded.

In a surprising twist, the story of Skinwalker Ranch gained government attention when James Lacatski, a Defense Intelligence Agency scientist, read “Hunt for the Skinwalker” and was compelled to investigate. This led to the creation of the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP) with a $22 million budget, awarded to Bigelow’s company. However, even with this significant investment, conclusive evidence of paranormal activity at Skinwalker Ranch remained elusive.

The narrative of Skinwalker Ranch is a complex blend of folklore, investigation, and government interest, yet it remains shrouded in mystery due to the lack of verifiable evidence despite extensive and costly explorations.

According to the video, at Skinwalker Ranch, a 500-acre property in Utah, a sinister force known as “The Hitchhiker” is alleged to exist. This malevolent poltergeist phenomenon is said to affect people’s health, immune systems, and follow individuals from the ranch to their homes in other states. The authors of the book “Skinwalkers at the Pentagon” compare this poltergeist to a pathogen, suggesting it might be an infectious agent similar to how COVID-19 originated. However, these claims are met with skepticism, as no tangible evidence has been provided to support these extraordinary assertions.

Nick Pope, a UFO expert, acknowledges the gravity of such claims but notes the lack of scientific rigor and evidence to substantiate them. The logical response to an outbreak or harmful phenomenon affecting human health would be to contact health authorities like the CDC, but this step was never taken by the ranch’s investigators. Instead, the phenomenon is described in books and TV shows, lacking the necessary scientific validation and peer-reviewed research.

The narrative of the ranch further looks into reports of strange creatures like the “dinobeaver,” a large animal with a dinosaur-like spine and beaver tail. Despite the investigators’ claims of being equipped with cameras and prepared to capture evidence, no photographic proof of this creature or other paranormal phenomena was provided, leading to questions about the credibility of the investigations and the scientific rigor applied.

Former employees of the ranch, who worked for its previous owner, millionaire Robert Bigelow, suggest that reports of paranormal activity were often exaggerated or fabricated to please Bigelow. These testimonies hint at a culture of embellishment to maintain the ranch’s mysterious reputation and Bigelow’s interest.

According to the video, in 2016, the ranch was sold to Brandon Fugal, another real estate millionaire with an interest in the paranormal. Fugal, who was initially skeptical, claims to have had his own paranormal experience at the ranch and has since opened it to investigations, even inviting skeptics to witness the phenomena. Despite these efforts, the lack of convincing, scientifically validated evidence continues to surround Skinwalker Ranch, leaving its mysteries more in the realm of folklore and entertainment rather than scientific fact.

In Pleasant Grove, Brandon’s hometown, where his Uncle Guy Fugal is the mayor, a routine stop unfolds. Brandon, known for his unique daily habit, fills up on his favorite drink, a mix of Diet Mountain Dew and a splash of Goji Citrus Strawberry. This concoction, consumed in significant quantities daily, is part of his ritual, starting every day with it at his beloved hometown gas station. Here, he’s a familiar face, a regular since childhood, reflecting on the importance of roots and heritage in his life.

Brandon’s family history intertwines deeply with the town and the LDS Church. His ancestors, Scandinavian converts to Mormonism, settled in the area in the 1860s, leaving a legacy that Brandon cherishes. This connection to his lineage is evident in the structures around the town, like the historic Fugal blacksmith shop built by his great-grandfather in the 1890s and the older structure, once a home to his great-great-grandfather.

The Mormon church’s history is significant to Brandon, tracing back to Joseph Smith’s visions in 1820 and the subsequent migration and establishment of the church in Utah. Brandon’s connection to this history is not just ancestral; it’s a living part of his identity.

Brandon’s life extends beyond his historical and religious roots. He plans to build his fourth home, a castle straight out of a fairy tale, complete with a haunted forest attraction for Halloween, incorporating his love for the extraordinary. His diverse interests are further reflected in his Salt Lake City condo, a hub of creativity where he indulges in music and houses an extensive collection of science fiction and fantasy memorabilia, including rare books and movie props.

Brandon’s journey to owning Skinwalker Ranch, a site of paranormal intrigue, began with his encounter with Joe Fermage and his pursuit of anti-gravity technology. This path led him to meet influential figures like General Wesley Clark, Hal Puthoff, and Kit Green. Despite the initial disappointment in Fermage’s project, Brandon’s curiosity and fascination with the unexplained were only fueled further, culminating in his acquisition of the ranch.

The ranch, a blend of science, history, and mystery, represents a confluence of Brandon’s interests and beliefs. It’s a place where his fascination with the unknown, his heritage, and his entrepreneurial spirit intersect, making him a unique figure in the exploration of the extraordinary.

The video emphasizes the necessity for a critical and discerning approach towards the UFO and paranormal phenomena narrative. It exposes a complex interplay of interests, misinformation, and government involvement. The use of negative and skeptical terms continues throughout, with references to “misleading information,” “media manipulation,” “unsubstantiated claims,” “sensationalized stories,” and “exaggerated reports.” This language underlines the overarching theme of skepticism and the need for thorough investigation. The narrative, especially regarding Skinwalker Ranch and the surrounding events, invites viewers to question the credibility and scientific validity of such phenomena. This conclusion reinforces that critical thinking and careful scrutiny are paramount, especially when such narratives shape public perception and influence government policy. The video leaves its audience with a clear perspective: to approach UFO and paranormal stories with a healthy dose of skepticism and a demand for empirical evidence.

The journey through UFO and paranormal research, as depicted in this video, underscores an important reality in the pursuit of unconventional truths. The more significant and closer to the truth these investigations potentially are, the greater the pushback and efforts to discredit them seem to become. The language and tone used in the video and its title may not just be a reflection of skepticism but could also signal the discomfort and resistance these topics elicit when they challenge established norms and narratives. It reminds us that in the quest for understanding phenomena that lie beyond conventional boundaries, one must be prepared to navigate through a sea of skepticism and ridicule, which might inadvertently point towards truths that are yet to be fully acknowledged and understood.