House Oversight Committee’s UFO Hearing July 26, 2023

Honorable members of the House Oversight Committee, esteemed witnesses, and fellow citizens, we convene today to address a topic that has long been shrouded in mystery and speculation. Our aim is to unveil the truth surrounding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs), a subject that is not only of great public interest but could also have profound implications for our national security and scientific understanding. It is our hope that today’s session will shed light on the extent of our government’s knowledge, its involvement, and its preparedness in relation to these phenomena. We aspire to promote transparency, accountability, and informed discussion as we navigate these uncharted waters together.

The three witnesses, David Grusch, David Fravor, and Ryan Graves, provided testimony to the House Oversight Committee.

Witnesses:

1. David Grusch – A former intelligence official and whistleblower, David Grusch claimed that the United States has in its possession “intact and partially intact” alien vehicles. Grusch also mentioned instances where individuals have been injured while attempting to reverse engineer UFOs and also cited instances of non-human “biologics” being found along with recovered crafts. He further alleged that there have been retaliatory actions against him due to his whistleblowing activities.
2. David Fravor – An ex-Navy commander, David Fravor reported witnessing an unidentified flying object during a 2004 training mission. His account of the sighting has become one of the most notable cases of military personnel reporting UFO encounters.
3. Ryan Graves – A retired Navy pilot, Ryan Graves has made numerous claims about seeing unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) off the Atlantic coast for years. He also appeared on CBS’s 60 Minutes in 2021, stating that UAP sightings were grossly under-reported and that these events were routine.

The following are the critical questions we propose to be asked during this hearing:

1. Has the US Government recognized definitive evidence of extraterrestrial or interdimensional entities or other unexplained forms of intelligence? If affirmative, how many is there evidence for and when was this discovery made for each?
2. Have there been instances of direct interaction or communication between the US or any foreign governments and alleged extraterrestrial or interdimensional entities? If so, could you share details about the content of such interactions?
3. Could you provide the identities and official roles of individuals who possess first-hand knowledge of, and access to, the alleged alien or UFO crash retrieval programs? Can you specify which facilities or military installations are purported to house any recovered material?
4. Can you identify any private and public corporations and private and public labs actively participating in these programs?
5. Assuming the existence of entities who may have coexisted with us for thousands of years, explain which are benevolent and which are malevolent, and how so?
6. Are there documented instances of aggression, either from these entities towards Earth, or vice versa? If so, what were the reasons and outcomes of these incidents?
7. Is there any evidence to suggest that these UAPs and entities have attempted to interfere with or manipulate critical infrastructures, defense systems, or telecommunications?
8. What are the designated special access programs handling such classified information, and how have these programs managed to circumvent traditional oversight mechanisms over the years? Can you specify the inception date of these programs, and who was responsible for their authorization?
9. What technological advancements, if any, have been inspired or derived from the study of recovered material or encounters with these phenomena?
10. Are there established contingency plans or protocols in the event of open or hostile contact with entities?
11. Have any patterns or recurring characteristics been identified in documented encounters with UAPs that could provide insights into their origins or intentions?
12. Has the U.S. government engaged in any cooperative efforts with other nations to study or respond to these phenomena? If so, what form have these international collaborations taken?
13. Has the U.S. government sought input or consultation from non-government experts, such as scientists, engineers, or scholars, to help interpret and understand these phenomena?
14. What impact, if any, does the U.S. government anticipate these revelations about UAPs or extraterrestrial entities may have on national security, scientific research, and public sentiment?
15. Are there ongoing research programs dedicated to the reverse engineering of technology retrieved from UAPs? If so, what progress has been made?
16. How does the government plan to manage public reaction and potential societal impacts if and when definitive proof of extraterrestrial intelligence is revealed?

In conclusion, we understand that some of the questions posed today may touch on sensitive areas and could challenge long-held norms of secrecy and classification. However, the potential implications of UAPs and any extraterrestrial contact necessitate a robust, open, and informed dialogue. The answers to these questions could reshape our understanding of our place in the universe, our security strategies, and the frontiers of scientific exploration. Our expectation is that the answers provided today, and in subsequent inquiries, will serve to foster transparency, bolster public trust, and ultimately enhance our collective preparedness for whatever the future may hold. Thank you for your commitment to truth and understanding, and we look forward to the thoughtful discussion that will unfold.

The below are the minutes of the meeting for the key takeaways:

1. Grusch has made allegations of grave misconduct regarding the misuse of Independent Research and Development (IRAD) funds. He contends that defense contractors, with government complicity, have been misappropriating these resources. This situation may involve a form of “self-funding.”
2. Grusch also testifies to the existence of unconventional projects within US government and contractor spheres, including the possession of spacecraft and non-human biological entities. He has disclosed names, locations, and other key details to the Inspector General (IG) and spent extensive hours (11 in total) with intelligence committees.
3. He asserts that these US entities, the government and its contractors, may have advanced technology, potentially obtained via reverse engineering from retrieved or crashed crafts.
4. Grusch additionally accuses these entities of intimidating, harming, and potentially orchestrating the murder of potential whistleblowers. Such actions are reportedly carried out to protect the secrecy surrounding these controversial projects.
5. He further implicates high-ranking, unelected officials within the military, Department of Defense (DoD), and defense contractor organizations, who are responsible for information classification, in these clandestine activities.
6. Satellite imagery purportedly exists that can substantiate these claims, showing crashes, tests, and retrievals of unidentified crafts.
7. Grusch has personally witnessed disturbing intimidation attempts aimed at him and his wife. He also claims to know individuals who have directly observed the non-human biological entities.
8. He has seen photos and documents, and even footage of a craft being shot down, which he described as “otherworldly.” This prompts speculation about the potential inter-dimensional nature of these crafts and the holographic principle.
9. Individuals working on reverse engineering programs related to unidentified flying objects (UFOs) have allegedly been injured or potentially harmed by Non-Human Intelligences (NHIs).
10. Gaetz, a significant figure in this narrative, has reportedly viewed image and radar data of a spherical Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and is prepared to legally demand this information from Eglin Air Force Base (AFB).
11. As for Dr. Kirkpatrick of AARO’s assertions that there’s no evidence of extraterrestrial visitation or phenomena defying scientific understanding, Grusch—while under oath—dismisses them as inaccurate.
12. Regarding communication with NHIs, Grusch stresses that he can only discuss this matter in a classified setting.
13. Ryan Graves presents a claim involving Boeing in a UAP incident over Vanderberg AFB, with a military witness and supporting documents.
14. Intimidation tactics, including cease and desist letters, have been used against commercial pilots who’ve witnessed UAPs, according to allegations.
15. Individuals currently involved in reverse engineering programs are willing to testify in a confidential, closed-door setting, provided they receive certain immunities and assurances.
16. It’s proposed that the UAPs might be assessing our defense capabilities and nuclear assets, testing for system vulnerabilities.
17. If officials don’t gain access to a Secure Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) for the next hearing, they risk facing employment termination or salary reduction under the Holman Rule, as indicated by Representative Ogles.
18. Grusch promises to provide all classified information Congress would like to know in a SCIF setting and to give a list of involved individuals to AOC and other panel members after the hearing. He has neither confirmed nor denied the Department of Energy’s involvement in UAP data collection and housing.