Confidential IR Picture Set of UAPs from the Legacy Program
On November 22, 2024, the Strange Mysteries YouTube channel received a chilling email claiming to contain classified information about UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). The anonymous sender, whistleblower, referenced a covert program called the Immaculate Constellation Program and shared alleged infrared images of mysterious “orbs” and “motherships” surveilling nuclear sites. They warned of high-level secrecy and urged verification of the materials.
Confidential IR Picture Set of UAPs from the Legacy Program – Please Read Carefully
To: Me [Strange Mysteries]
I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out with information that has been classified and intentionally withheld from the public, regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) and the ongoing, covert operations surrounding them. My decision to reach out to you has not been made lightly, and I am fully aware of the risks involved.
I initially considered other individuals to share this information with, including another who expressed interest but was unable to commit due to other obligations. However, given the sensitive nature of this material and the extreme precautions necessary to protect my identity, I believe you are the best suited to handle this information responsibly.
Many traditional media outlets would require verification of my identity and credentials. This is not feasible due to the risks involved. These organizations, despite their best intentions, are not equipped to handle the level of secrecy and potential retaliation associated with this information.
However, I will tell you that I was part of one of the legacy programs, overseen by a parent program. I know that’s vague, but unfortunately, that’s all I can offer at this point.
You know I can’t say what program or what was the name of this program, right?
Well, it was called the Immaculate Constellation Program, that you are familiar with now.
The images I’m providing have been carefully anonymized. I’ve ensured that they have been made accessible to hundreds of people within the system. This way, my identity is shielded, making it far less likely that I can be traced as the source of this leak. These images, captured through various ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) collection methods, show clear evidence of what has been termed “orbs” and “motherships,” different shapes operating at various sites of extreme sensitivity. Among the locations featured are nuclear deterrent bases, and these objects are clearly surveilling these sites, sometimes within close proximity.
While I am not prepared to discuss the incidents associated with these images further, it’s important for you to understand that these files are not available online. I urge you to use any method at your disposal, reverse image searches, analysis by your community, or whatever you need to do to validate these materials and convey their authenticity to your audience.
My responsibility here is to ensure the truth is brought to light. How you choose to proceed is up to you, but I hope the evidence I’ve provided will speak for itself.
Sincerely,
[Redacted]
P.S. Kindly keep my email confidential when sharing this with your audience. I may have more to share with you in the future.
The host of Strange Mysteries youtube channel, examined the images, which were delivered in a 14-page PDF labeled “Immaculate Constellation UAP IR Cam Picture Set Research Station NA 43.” The images, mostly in black and white due to their infrared nature, included unusual shapes and patterns, such as starfish-like objects, discs with distinctive markings, and spinning crosses.
The second correspondence from the whistleblower offers a candid and thought-provoking response to the mixed reactions from the UAP community regarding their previous release. In this message, they address criticism of one of the leaked images—dismissed by some as resembling a “ceiling fan”—and highlight the double standards in how such content is treated based on its origin. The whistleblower also shares new insights into the classification and authenticity of the images, emphasizing their anomalous nature and the advanced ISR systems used to collect them, while firmly rejecting any notion of AI fabrication.
The whistleblower’s frustration with the ridicule and lack of engagement is palpable, as they signal a halt to further incremental leaks, citing a lack of preparedness within the audience.
Nathan, while reading this, try to pace yourself, brother; we don’t want you or your viewers having a stroke mid-stream. Just kidding, thanks in advance, buddy.
To the supportive and constructive comments: you’re the real MVPs of this movement. The slog for transparency isn’t easy, and it’s your thoughtful engagement that keeps the wheels turning. Now, onto the main topics:
1. The Ceiling Fan UFO: Peak Comedy
I’ll admit, the ceiling fan comparison gave me a good laugh, thanks for that. But here’s the thing: last I checked, Home Depot doesn’t stock gravity-defying, high-altitude, thermally anomalous ceiling fans.
Let’s be real here. Yes, UAPs come in all sorts of bizarre shapes, but to chalk this one up to a ceiling fan? It’s a disservice to the serious analysis required for this field. Let’s not forget that half of you were ready to canonize the jellyfish footage (you know, the one that looks like a melted Imperial Probe Droid) just because someone with a name shared it.
If some random person had leaked that jellyfish footage, it would’ve been dismissed outright—just like many of you initially wrote off the Tic Tac footage before The New York Times gave it legitimacy. Double standards much?
2. Why This Ceiling Fan UAP Looking Image Was Included
The so-called “ceiling fan UAP” made it into that document for one reason: it was anomalous. Period. I didn’t provide explanations because I didn’t have to. The purpose was to present data, not to hold anyone’s hand through their conclusions.
For context, that image and several others were gathered using different classified ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) systems—HUD captures, thermal optics, and FLIR from platforms operated not just by the U.S. but by allied intelligence services. We’re talking about a range of sources, each with their own capabilities and classifications. Some of these images date back decades, others are more recent, and yes, some originate from allied agencies.
And before anyone trots out the “AI-generated” argument: No, this wasn’t AI-generated. If I were trying to fabricate something using AI, I’d pick a design far more compelling than a “ceiling fan.”
3. The Cruciform Entity
Yes, it resembles historical accounts; like the Nuremberg celestial phenomenon and the incident over Guildford, Surrey. This isn’t coincidental; similar configurations have been observed across various platforms and timeframes. There are multiple documented shapes of the Cruciform Entity, and its behavior suggests something far beyond our current technological capabilities.
4. Why I Sent the Images
This was, above all, a test—a way to gauge what the public can and cannot digest. Think of it as a litmus test for the community’s readiness. Some of you passed with flying colors, critically engaging with the material. Others… not so much.
Unfortunately, as I’ve seen with the reactions to this image, I’m left questioning whether the broader community is ready for meaningful disclosure. Many of you dismissed something genuinely anomalous as a ceiling fan, much like how people dismissed the Tic Tac footage for years. This sort of knee-jerk ridicule undermines serious discussion and analysis.
5. The Road Ahead
Here’s the part that may disappoint some of you: I won’t be continuing this process. My original plan was to release these leaks incrementally, ramping up to higher-definition imagery and more compelling evidence. The initial PDF release, including the “last puff of a cigarette” imagery, was meant to start the conversation, not end it.
But seeing how quickly this community dismissed valid data as “ceiling fans,” I’m not convinced you’re ready. Disclosure is a privilege, not an entitlement, and the reactions I’ve seen so far don’t inspire confidence. And for those waiting on certain groups (you know who they are) to step up, good luck. Evangelicals will label these entities “demonic” and shut the conversation down. Others, like Luis, will tell you they “need to have this conversation in a SCIF” and leave it at that.
Be seeing you, guys!
In the second part of the Strange Mysteries video series, the host provides an update on the ongoing communication with an anonymous individual claiming access to classified UAP-related materials, purportedly linked to the Immaculate Constellation program.
The anonymous source responded to criticism, particularly comments dismissing one of the UAP images as resembling a ceiling fan. They argued that such dismissals undermine serious discussions about UAPs and pointed out a double standard in how the community approaches leaked content depending on its source. The source reiterated that the controversial image was included because it was deemed anomalous, explaining that the images were collected through classified ISR systems, some dating back decades and involving allied intelligence agencies. They firmly denied any AI involvement in generating the images, emphasizing the authenticity of the materials.
Among the newly shared content were additional images, including highly detailed ones that the source ultimately requested to be blurred before sharing. These included a supposed close-up of a UAP firing its engines, an image from a drone-based ARV retrieval mission, a detailed shot of a “mothership” with an open bay door, and a frontal view of the so-called “cruciform entity.” The host described the “cruciform entity” as particularly eerie, with a visual presence that felt intimidating and otherworldly. Connections were drawn to historical accounts, such as the 1561 Nuremberg celestial phenomenon, suggesting potential links to earlier sightings of similar shapes.
The source also hinted that their initial release was intended as a test to gauge public readiness for disclosure, expressing disappointment at the dismissive reactions. This reaction, combined with the potential risks of further leaks, led them to pause their efforts to share higher-quality evidence. They suggested that disclosure is a privilege requiring a thoughtful and serious audience, hinting that the broader community might not yet be prepared for more compelling revelations.
