Blocking Souls: The Digital Divide and the Influence of Higher Powers
In today’s interconnected world, X.com (formerly Twitter) serves as a platform for exchanging ideas, connecting communities, and engaging in dialogue. However, a concerning trend has emerged: the block feature, not as a tool for self-protection but as a mechanism for exclusion and judgment. This behavior, while seemingly trivial on an individual level, has a compounding effect when multiplied across millions of interactions. Each instance of digital severance contributes to a growing culture of ideological silos, where people engage only with those who reinforce their existing beliefs.
Over time, this not only stifles open discussion but also fosters division on a much larger scale—one that echoes into social, political, and even spiritual conflicts. Humanity’s greatest failures—World War I, World War II, the Cold War, and modern conflicts like Russia-Ukraine—were not born from sudden eruptions of violence but from the breakdown of communication and the inability to find win-win solutions during moments of peace. When opposing sides refuse to engage in dialogue, they create a vacuum where fear, misunderstanding, and hostility thrive. The digital sphere mirrors this on a micro level: the more people block and silence opposing voices, the less opportunity there is to resolve differences before they escalate into full-scale confrontations.
If left unchecked, this small act of disconnection can cascade into a world where ideological walls are built higher rather than bridges of understanding. Looking ahead, tensions between global powers like China and Taiwan (USA) serve as a reminder that ignoring communication and failing to seek mutual benefit only accelerates division. In the past, history has shown that wars often stem from leaders talking past each other rather than with each other. If society continues to normalize shutting out opposing viewpoints rather than engaging with them, we may find ourselves accelerating toward greater conflict—not just online, but in the real world.
Blocking is increasingly used to silence dissent, avoid critique, or assert dominance. This creates echo chambers, fosters division, and eliminates opportunities for reconciliation and understanding. The act of blocking often mirrors a judgment of another’s worthiness to engage, contradicting teachings such as “judge not, that you be not judged” (Matthew 7:1) and the call to forgive “seventy times seven” (Matthew 18:22). Isolation weakens the communal fabric, alienating individuals and perpetuating cycles of bitterness.
When faced with the digital slight of being blocked, one might grapple with the dilemma of reciprocation versus restraint. The ancient principle of “an eye for an eye” suggests a mirrored response, potentially leading one to block in return. However, this path may perpetuate a cycle of exclusion and negativity. Alternatively, embracing the ethos of “turning the other cheek,” as taught in Matthew 5:38–39, encourages us to resist retaliation and maintain open channels of communication. By choosing not to block back, we uphold the values of forgiveness and understanding, fostering digital spaces that reflect compassion over conflict.
This phenomenon also has broader metaphysical implications. Throughout history, humanity has been influenced by unseen forces—whether divine or demonic—that shape our behaviors and choices. Could these intelligences subtly amplify exclusionary tendencies, deepening societal and spiritual rifts? Blocking, though minor in appearance, symbolizes division, reflecting larger cosmic battles between forces of unity and discord.
The connection between human actions and cosmic phenomena becomes even clearer when considering the unrest in the skies above New Jersey and around the world. Recent reports of unusual aerial activity, including UFO sightings, have sparked speculation about a larger spiritual or metaphysical conflict manifesting in our reality. These phenomena are not mere anomalies; they may symbolize a broader struggle between forces striving for harmony and those fostering division. The energies of isolation, exclusion, and discord on Earth may contribute to these disturbances, echoing the Hermetic principle, “As above, so below.”
The act of blocking (and obviously other evil things) can set off a chain reaction of negativity, akin to a spreading rot that infects everything it touches. When someone is blocked, the rejection they feel often metastasizes into anger or resentment, which they unconsciously carry into their interactions with others. This negativity then multiplies, like a viral contagion, creating rifts not only in personal relationships but across broader social dynamics. This chain reaction isn’t just confined to the digital realm—it ripples outward, fueling broader societal and spiritual disunity.
Scripture emphasizes connection and compassion: “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Mark 12:31). Jesus himself reached out to the marginalized and those who opposed Him. If He were on X.com, would He block dissenters? It seems unlikely. Instead, His teachings urge dialogue, forgiveness, and bridge-building. When individuals or societies choose exclusion, they risk aligning with forces that perpetuate division—both terrestrially and cosmically.
A personal example highlights this issue. Renowned scientist Dr. Garry Nolan, known for his work on non-human intelligences (NHI), blocked me on X.com. On paper, we had much in common—both a science background (he understand science better) and experiences with NHI (I understand much better). However, our perspectives differed significantly. From my experience, I act with the awareness that both an angel (13 in my case) and a demon (one that attached to my leg) are physically present, observing my actions, and strive to balance their influences to restore harmony when disruptions arise.
While disheartening, this experience reflects a larger pattern of exclusion that undermines the values of open dialogue and collective growth. Such actions ripple beyond the digital sphere, potentially mirroring larger conflicts between forces of light and darkness.
This exclusionary behavior becomes especially ironic given Dr. Nolan’s role as an advocate for disclosure. By blocking individuals, he inadvertently perpetuates the fragmentation he seeks to address. Could these small acts of division contribute to the unrest we see in the skies? The growing number of UFO sightings, especially in places like New Jersey, might reflect humanity’s collective energy. Acts of exclusion, even on a digital platform, can ripple outward, influencing both societal and metaphysical realms.
The Hermetic principle reminds us that our earthly actions resonate in the broader cosmos. Blocking someone is not just a digital gesture but a symbolic act that may reinforce division and conflict, both terrestrially and metaphysically. Conversely, fostering inclusivity and dialogue aligns with divine energies, contributing to unity and enlightenment.
The celestial unrest observed in the skies could serve as a reflection of humanity’s struggles. Are the increased UFO sightings simply manifestations of technological phenomena, or do they symbolize deeper spiritual conflicts? Perhaps they represent a cosmic mirror, reflecting our divisions and urging us to reconcile—not only with one another but with the universal forces of light and unity.
As users of technology, we face a choice: Will we allow digital platforms to amplify division, or will we rise above, fostering connection and understanding? Blocking may offer immediate relief but often reflects deeper emotions—fear, pride, or anger—that Scripture warns against. By choosing dialogue over exclusion, we align with higher principles of compassion and unity.
In the end, our online interactions shape the kind of world we wish to create. Let us remember that every soul, even in the digital realm, is deserving of respect and understanding. The decisions we make today—whether to block or to engage—echo beyond the moment, influencing not just our communities but the greater harmony of existence.
