Biden vs. Trump: The Battle for Alien Disclosure in the 2024 Election

In the podcast episode “Need to Know #51 – UFO Burnout” released on April 15, 2024, the central theme revolves around the concept of “truth vs. disclosure” as a significant issue in the upcoming presidential election. The discussion touches on various intriguing topics, including how closely the current situation aligns with the metaphorical “Doomsday Clock” due to the current threats of WW3 and the unknown nature of the phenomena.

The episode looked into the ongoing issue of untracked drones (UFO) over U.S. bases, contrasting it with the effective neutralization of threats in other regions, specifically over Israel, in which wars could be pivotal in the presidential debates.

The next United States presidential election is scheduled for Tuesday, November 5, 2024. Presidential elections in the U.S. are held every four years on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

By emphasizing the contrasts between different approaches to the issue, it can be transformed into a wedge issue that influences electoral outcomes significantly. How come these drones can be shot down over war zones but not over domestic military bases?

The hosts, Bryce Zabel and Ross Coulthart, discuss these points extensively, pondering the ramifications of these revelations not only on national security but also on the political landscape, where UFO truth and transparency could become critical factors in voter decision-making.

During his presidency, Donald Trump publicly acknowledged the strange nature of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs), exhibiting both skepticism and curiosity about their origins and implications. This period also marked the establishment of the U.S. Space Force in 2019, an initiative that underscored the administration’s commitment to addressing issues related to space security. The creation of the Space Force was a significant step, indicating a proactive approach to the challenges and unknowns in outer space, potentially including UAPs.

President Joe Biden recently addressed the topic of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs), sparking widespread anticipation of potential disclosure among enthusiasts and the general public. His comments on the need to monitor and potentially neutralize unidentified objects flying in U.S. airspace have heightened expectations that the government might soon provide more transparency regarding these mysterious sightings.

Donald Trump showed a relatively more open approach to UAP disclosure during his presidency compared to traditional standards. He openly acknowledged UAPs in interviews, including a notable one with his son where they discussed the subject somewhat candidly. Trump’s administration was also in office when the Pentagon officially released Navy pilot UAP videos, indicating a shift towards transparency.

Joe Biden, while having a long tenure in government, including eight years as Vice President, has not been as vocal about UAPs until more recently. His administration has continued to treat the topic with caution, emphasizing national security concerns over public curiosity. Despite recent talks about addressing UAPs more openly, there has been no significant move towards full disclosure under his presidency, continuing a more guarded stance that aligns with his longstanding approach in government roles.

Considering these nuances, Donald Trump might be seen as having been more proactive in engaging with the topic publicly, potentially fostering a slightly more disclosure-friendly environment compared to Joe Biden’s more traditional, secrecy-focused approach.

When an issue becomes particularly important or central in an election, it is often referred to as a “wedge issue.” This term is used because such issues can be highly controversial or divisive, effectively driving a “wedge” between different segments of voters. These issues typically provoke strong emotions and can significantly influence voter turnout and preferences, shaping the overall dynamics of an election.

Senator Marco Rubio is highlighted as a pro-disclosure figure, emphasizing the growing political momentum for making UFO-related information a pivotal issue in the presidential campaign. This is underscored by Tim Galludet’s comments about multiple alien species, raising questions about the broader implications of such disclosures on humanity and national security.

Creating a wedge issue in politics, like UFO and NHI disclosure, involves highlighting a topic that is likely to split public opinion significantly, thus influencing electoral choices and political alignments. If we assume the scenario of an alien craft crash retrieval program with the recovery of non-human intelligent beings, turning this into a wedge issue could involve several steps:

1. Public Disclosure: The issue would first need to be brought into the public domain, either through official announcements, leaks, or investigative journalism. The revelation of such an event would naturally attract significant media attention and public curiosity.
2. Framing the Debate: Different political groups might frame the issue in various ways to align with their ideologies. For example:
   • National security: One side might argue that the presence of non-human intelligence poses a threat to national security, advocating for strict containment and increased military spending.
   • Scientific and ethical considerations: Another side might emphasize the potential scientific breakthroughs and the ethical implications of how these beings are treated.
3. Mobilizing Supporters: Political figures and parties would likely use this issue to mobilize their base. This could include public speeches, debates, and campaigns that emphasize their stance on how the situation should be handled.
4. Legislative Action: Proposals for new laws or changes to existing laws regarding extraterrestrial contact could become pivotal campaign issues. Candidates might pledge to introduce or oppose such legislation based on their stance.
5. Media and Public Opinion: Media outlets would play a crucial role in shaping public opinion by highlighting different aspects of the issue. This could include debates on the ethical treatment of the beings, the implications for humanity’s understanding of the universe, and the security measures necessary to deal with the situation.
6. Impact on Voter Behavior: Depending on how divisive the issue becomes, it could significantly impact voter behavior. People might vote based on a candidate’s stance on dealing with non-human intelligence, making it a defining issue of the election.

As the 2024 presidential election approaches, the topic of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) and the potential existence of non-human intelligence (NHI) has surfaced as a pressing issue that demands attention in the national discourse. Given the revelations and discussions highlighted in the podcast “Need to Know #51 – UFO Burnout,” it is clear that UAPs could significantly influence public opinion and voter behavior.

This subject, therefore, should be escalated into a central wedge issue during the presidential debates, urging candidates to clarify their positions on disclosure versus secrecy. As figures like Senator Marco Rubio push for transparency, and with the growing public interest sparked by both President Biden’s and former President Trump’s engagement with the topic, this election presents a pivotal opportunity to demand comprehensive disclosure. This issue not only affects national security but also addresses human curiosity about our place in the universe. Bringing UAP and NHI disclosure to the forefront in the debates would not only ensure the candidates’ accountability but could also catalyze the necessary political momentum to unveil the truths that have long been shrouded in secrecy.