Min Min Lights Incident (2022)
Min Min lights, often described as spherical or orb-like in appearance, have long intrigued observers in Australia’s outback, particularly in regions like Queensland’s Channel Country. Witnesses frequently report these lights as glowing, hovering spheres that vary in size, brightness, and color, with hues ranging from white and yellow to green and red. Their spherical nature, coupled with their seemingly intelligent movement, has solidified their reputation as a fascinating and mysterious phenomenon. These lights are said to hover just above the ground, maintaining a distinct orb-like shape as they move across the landscape, sometimes appearing to follow or lead travelers. In some cases, they exhibit playful behavior, evading pursuit in a way that feels almost intentional. Descriptions of their luminosity often highlight their dynamic nature, with reports of pulsating brightness or shifting intensity, further emphasizing their rounded, three-dimensional appearance.
Chris Lehto recently shared an intriguing interview with Michael, an anonymous witness who captured high-definition footage of a UFO. The video was filmed on December 18, 2022, at 1:17 AM while Michael was camping in Queensland. In the interview, Lehto explored Michael’s experience and the footage itself, emphasizing the uniqueness of the recording. Michael chose to remain anonymous, which Lehto respects, given the potential for harassment often associated with UFO witnesses. To verify his credibility, Lehto confirmed Michael’s identity through documentation and background checks, although the story remains a single-source account.
According to the metadata provided by the witness, an event was documented using a Huawei P19 Pro phone on December 18, 2022, at 1:17 AM. The witness was camping in the Queensland Outback, specifically in the area of Noorindoo, located approximately 50 kilometers north of Surat. This setting, described as remote and isolated, suggests minimal light pollution, which may have contributed to the clarity and visibility of the recorded event. The metadata serves as a timestamp and geographical anchor, providing verifiable details about the time and location of the occurrence. The specific metadata details emphasize the credibility of the documentation.
Chris Lehto has an interview with Michael, who shared his firsthand experience. Michael, who resides in New South Wales, recounted traveling to Central Queensland with a friend, where they camped under the open sky. While his companion slept, Michael observed a red light shooting across the sky at incredible speed, reminiscent of a shooting star. Initially dismissing it as space debris, such as a satellite fragment burning up in the atmosphere, he was startled when the light returned, this time moving slowly and deliberately. It eventually hovered overhead, descending gradually.
Throughout the interview, Michael’s authenticity was reinforced by his willingness to provide personal documentation and his detailed account of the event. Lehto’s careful investigation, combined with Michael’s candid testimony, made this case compelling, with the video standing out as a rare and well-documented instance of a UFO encounter.
According to his testimony, the object hovered above his campsite for approximately two minutes before he managed to retrieve his phone and begin recording. Initially, the object displayed red light, which then shifted through a spectrum of colors as it descended. By the time Michael began filming, the object was directly overhead, radiating a brightness that he described as “perfect white light,” though this appeared red in the recorded video. He noted that the light illuminated his surroundings, including his tent and car, with an intensity akin to a powerful spotlight. Despite its brightness, the light did not hurt his eyes, and he reported feeling a vibration that caused a faint sensation, although he emphasized that the experience felt safe rather than threatening.
The object itself, as observed by Michael, was massive, comparable in size to a house or larger, and featured intricate structural details. He described protrusions at the bottom, several concentric rings, and markings resembling angular, foreign characters arranged in an arc around one of the inner rings. These details were not visible in the video but were clear to Michael during the sighting. The object emitted a sound reminiscent of an electrical hum, similar to the noise of an arc welder, which changed pitch as the object moved. When the object finally departed, it did so instantaneously, achieving a high speed without noticeable acceleration, and disappeared beyond the horizon while the sound lingered momentarily.
Michael’s calm yet astonished recollection included his physical positioning during the recording, as he lay back in a camp chair to steady the camera. He expressed frustration that his friend, who was asleep at the time, did not witness the event. His firsthand observation revealed intricate details of the object’s structure and behavior, reinforcing his conviction that the phenomenon was unlike any known aircraft or drone, particularly given the remote location, far from populated areas or technological interference.
Michael’s detailed account extended to the structure of the craft, which he estimated to be 30 meters across. He noted intricate features, including protrusions, concentric rings, and angular markings resembling an unknown script on one of the inner rings—details that were clear to him in person but not captured by the video. The craft’s behavior, including its rapid departure, left him astonished; it vanished instantly without acceleration, leaving behind only the fading hum of what he described as an electrical sound.
The investigation gained traction with the involvement of investigative journalist Ross Coulthart, who found Michael’s testimony credible despite its extraordinary claims. Coulthart noted Michael’s consistent recall, transparency about his background, and the technical limitations that made fabricating the video unlikely for someone of his expertise. Ross also highlighted Michael’s high intelligence and social anxiety, suggesting these traits reinforced the sincerity of his account.
The UFO incidents involving Michael in Queensland, Australia, and Juanito Juan UFO Incident in Tamaulipas, Mexico, share several similarities, particularly in the visual and dynamic characteristics of the unidentified objects. Both cases involve spherical objects that exhibited notable luminosity and emitted various colors, with Michael’s object transitioning through shades of purple, green, and red before radiating a bright white light, and Juanito’s spheres also reported to emit light in multiple colors during later encounters. Both witnesses described their respective objects as hovering in the sky, displaying unusual flight behavior, and eliciting a sense of awe.
As a child, I personally witnessed hundreds of these UFO Spheres. Most of the time, the Spheres looked like a Fluid Silver Sphere, sometimes they looked like white ovals when moving, but sometimes they look exactly like what others have reported in these two incidents.
Cultural accounts, particularly from Indigenous Australian communities, refer to the lights as “spirit orbs,” linking them to ancestral spirits and reinforcing their association with folklore. European settlers also contributed to the lore, noting an increase in sightings after their arrival.
