Why Didn’t They Want a Firsthand Witness to Testify?

In Episode #65 of the WEAPONIZED podcast, released on January 26, 2025, George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell discuss the recent UFO hearing and Jeremy’s new documentary series, UFO REVOLUTION. Produced by TMZ and available on TUBI, the three-part documentary exposes instances of corruption while following their efforts to push the UFO subject into public discourse and facilitate whistleblower testimonies before Congress. Throughout the episode, Knapp and Corbell highlight the significant roadblocks they encountered, including government efforts to control the UAP narrative and manipulate how information is disclosed.

A key moment in the discussion comes when they address the removal of a firsthand witness from testifying before Congress. Around the 43:54 mark, Knapp expresses frustration over the decision, questioning why a witness who had been vetted, introduced to Congressional offices, and prepared to testify was ultimately blocked. George Knapp states, “A bigger question is why would they not take the opportunity to have that witness testify? He was introduced to them, he offered to be there in person. We keep hearing this—why not Hands-On whistleblower, somebody who’s seen this stuff or knows about it with their own eyes and can testify firsthand? Why don’t they testify? This guy was ready to do it, maybe still ready to do it, and they didn’t make it happen. They didn’t pursue it at all. Why not?” This statement underscores the concern that testimony was being selectively controlled, reinforcing fears that the UAP disclosure process is being carefully shaped rather than presented transparently.

The episode further explores concerns over the Immaculate Constellation Report, which had been submitted to the Congressional Record but was misattributed in a way that distorted its significance. Corbell and Knapp argue that this, combined with the sidelining of key witnesses, demonstrates a systematic effort to control the narrative surrounding UAPs. They suggest that whistleblowers are not being fully supported, but rather, their information is being filtered and manipulated before reaching the public. Corbell, in particular, expresses frustration over how the process played out, stating that the incident has eroded his ability to promise protection to future whistleblowers.

As the conversation continues, both Knapp and Corbell speculate on what these developments mean for the future of disclosure. They warn that, despite growing public interest and media attention, powerful figures are working behind the scenes to maintain control over the information being released. The discussion implies that the push for greater transparency may be countered by efforts to shift sensitive knowledge into private industry, away from public scrutiny. In their view, this process is not just about national security but also about financial and corporate interests, as companies seek to control potentially lucrative technologies derived from recovered UAP materials.

George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell argue that control over the UAP narrative is being deliberately orchestrated, with certain individuals being “ordained” to act as gatekeepers. Corbell suggests that these figures serve as “filters” to manage what information reaches the public, potentially blocking genuine whistleblowers while allowing a controlled version of events to emerge. Knapp describes this as a “changing of the guard,” where secrecy is shifting from the military-industrial complex to private industry, particularly big tech and aerospace corporations. This transition, they warn, is not about transparency but about consolidating control over UAP-related knowledge and technology.

George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell discuss the handling of the “Immaculate Constellation” report, alleging intentional manipulation within the Congressional Record. Corbell claims that a critical page, referred to as both the “12th page” and the “first page,” was deliberately omitted, thereby distorting the document’s significance. He describes this realization as “shocking,” asserting that it evidences a high-level effort to control information. Knapp concurs, suggesting that this was not a clerical error but a deliberate attempt to reshape the historical record, effectively blocking whistleblowers while allowing only selected narratives to guide the discourse on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).

Jeremy Corbell criticizes Michael Shellenberger’s questionable role in the handling of the Immaculate Constellation Report. Corbell states that he personally handed the document to Congress, yet Shellenberger was publicly credited with its submission despite only seeing it for the first time the night before the hearing. During the session, when Nancy Mace falsely credited Shellenberger, Corbell confronted him, yelling, “Hey Michael! She just lied. Are you going to correct the record?” but received no response. Corbell interprets Shellenberger’s silence as complicity in controlling the narrative, while George Knapp adds that this incident highlights how certain media figures may be positioned as controlled messengers rather than independent reporters.

George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell discuss the possibility of a staged UFO threat, warning that the government could fabricate an alien “crisis” to justify increased secrecy and defense spending. Corbell acknowledges that while he hopes this is not true, the long history of deception in the UAP subject makes it a legitimate concern. Knapp draws parallels to false flag operations used in the past to consolidate power, cautioning that if an alien invasion narrative suddenly emerges, the public should approach it with skepticism rather than blind acceptance.

The revelations in WEAPONIZED Episode #65 highlight deep concerns about the control, manipulation, and potential deception surrounding the UAP narrative. From blocking firsthand witnesses to altering official records and positioning gatekeepers, Knapp and Corbell argue that transparency is being carefully managed rather than openly pursued. Their discussion raises critical questions about whether genuine disclosure is even possible under the current system, or if efforts are being made to shift control of UAP-related knowledge into private hands. This aligns with revelations about Project Coral Lane, which allegedly sought to harness advanced technologies in ways that remain obscured from public scrutiny. As more whistleblowers attempt to come forward, the fight for truth appears to be an ongoing battle against powerful forces determined to control the narrative.