Binary Code used to Communicate with NHI

In December 1980, during the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident, U.S. Air Force Sergeant Jim Penniston not only walked around the craft but touched it, feeling an electric current run through his body. He described the sensation as an “information download” into his brain, a concept that would later take on deeper significance. That night, back in his barracks, Penniston began to visualize sequences of ones and zeroes in his mind’s eye. The numbers were so clear and vivid that he felt compelled to write them down, filling pages in his notebook over several weeks. At the time, Penniston had no knowledge of binary code or computational systems; it simply felt as though transcribing the code gave him a sense of relief.

For decades, the notebook remained stored away until 2010, when Penniston revealed it during an interview and investigation surrounding the symbols he had seen on the craft. Investigators noticed the extensive binary sequences and sent them to a computer programmer for analysis. What came back shocked everyone, including Penniston himself. The binary code translated into a coherent message using ASCII, which read: “Exploration of Humanity. Continuous for Planetary Advance. Eyes of our Eyes. Origin Year 8100.” Along with the message, the binary sequence contained coordinates for specific geographic locations across Earth, including the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt, the Nazca Lines in Peru, Sedona in Arizona, Caracol in Belize, the Temple of Apollo in Greece, Tai Shan in China, and a point in the Atlantic Ocean, 300 miles west of Ireland. This final location corresponds to the legendary island of Hy-Brasil, a place steeped in Celtic mythology and depicted on medieval maps as a mysterious landmass that has since vanished.

The message, “Origin Year 8100,” and the phrase, “Eyes of our Eyes,” added layers of mystery to the incident, leading to speculation that the craft and its message may not have come from extraterrestrial beings but rather from future humans. Penniston himself stated he did not believe the craft was alien in origin but suggested it might be from another dimension or even another time. Supporting this theory, physicist Ronald Mallett proposed that binary code would be the ideal method for sending messages through time, as it can be transmitted in its simplest form through spin or laser technology, warping space and time.

Though the Rendlesham Forest incident included corroborating evidence such as radiation readings, indentations in the ground, and audio recordings made by Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt, Penniston’s binary code remains unique to his experience. None of his fellow servicemen, including John Burroughs and Charles Halt, reported receiving similar downloads or information. Critics argue that Penniston’s binary code may have been a fabrication or the result of subconscious influences, yet the precision of the coordinates—particularly the reference to Hy-Brasil—raises questions about how he could have produced such data without prior knowledge.

The Chilbolton Crop Circle, which appeared near the Chilbolton radio telescope in Hampshire, England, in August 2001, is notable for its incorporation of binary code. This formation closely mirrored the famous Arecibo message sent into space in 1974. Created by Dr. Frank Drake and Carl Sagan, the original Arecibo message was broadcast as binary code, consisting of ones and zeros that, when decoded, revealed a pictorial message containing information about humanity, Earth, and the structure of our solar system.

The Chilbolton formation replicated the basic layout of the Arecibo message but included striking alterations. Where the original message depicted human DNA, the Chilbolton version showed a different DNA structure, hinting at a hybridized or altered genetic composition. The figure representing humanity was replaced with one showing a large head and small body, reminiscent of descriptions of “grey aliens.” The depiction of the solar system was also modified, emphasizing an additional planet or moon, suggesting an alternate origin point. Additionally, the image of the “transmitter” at the bottom of the message was replaced with a far more intricate design, appearing advanced compared to the simple depiction in the 1974 transmission.

The inclusion of binary-style encoding in the Chilbolton formation strongly implied that the message was created using similar logical principles as the original Arecibo broadcast. This led some researchers to speculate that the formation represented an “answer” to humanity’s message, suggesting communication from an unknown intelligence.

The Chilbolton Crop Circle of 2001 has sparked significant debate over its origins and meaning. Some enthusiasts view the formation as a direct response to the 1974 Arecibo message, suggesting it represents an attempt at communication from extraterrestrial beings, possibly the “Greys.” They highlight the crop circle’s intricate design and its proximity to the Chilbolton radio telescope as compelling evidence that the formation was intentionally placed to convey a message. This interpretation fuels theories that extraterrestrial intelligence used binary encoding, mirroring the method employed in the original Arecibo message, to send a reply.

The Crabwood Crop Circle of 2002 delivered an ominous warning through its binary-encoded message, suggesting humanity should be cautious about engaging with the Greys. The decoded message read: “Beware the bearers of FALSE gifts & their BROKEN PROMISES. Much PAIN but still time. BELIEVE. There is GOOD out there. We oPpose DECEPTION. COnduit CLOSING.” The inclusion of an alien-like face alongside this message emphasized the cautionary tone, as if to warn against accepting deceptive offerings—potentially advanced technologies—from entities whose intentions may not align with humanity’s best interests. The message has been interpreted by some as a direct attempt to alert us about the Greys’ potential for manipulation and the hidden consequences of engaging with them. This warning raises profound questions about whether humanity has already entered into secret communication or agreements, perhaps through projects like the alleged Project Sigma, without fully understanding the risks involved. According to various sources, the initial contact with aliens is claimed to have been made in 1953 and officially recorded communication started in 1959 utilizing binary computer language.

The Zanfretta Abduction of 1978 describes an extraordinary encounter in which Italian security guard Pier Zanfretta claimed to have been abducted by reptilian-like extraterrestrials. According to Zanfretta, these beings were large, humanoid creatures with reptilian features, described as terrifying in appearance. During the abduction, the beings communicated with him through a device that displayed symbols rather than using spoken language. Some researchers have speculated that these symbols could be related to binary code, potentially aligning with concepts of advanced technological communication.

Military insignia, patches, often serve as cryptic representations of a unit’s mission and ethos. For specialized research groups, such as those focused on reverse engineering UFOs, elements like binary code and metallic spheres on their patches carry nuanced significance. The phrase “Measure Analyze Protect” encapsulates a systematic approach: first, obtaining precise measurements of unknown technologies; second, conducting rigorous analyses to understand their functions; and third, safeguarding the findings due to their potential implications for national security and technological advancement.

Binary code can indeed be used through both light and sound, which aligns with observations reported in various UFO and UAP encounters. Light-based binary communication relies on alternating “on” and “off” signals—similar to a flashlight blinking in patterns, where “on” represents 1 and “off” represents 0. This form mirrors systems like Morse code or optical telegraphy, where information is conveyed through visual pulses.

Similarly, sound can carry binary data by transmitting alternating frequencies or tones. For instance, a high tone could represent 1, while a low tone represents 0. This method is akin to early modem technology, where binary sequences were encoded into audio signals for transmission. Reports of UFO sightings, including electromagnetic interference (EMI), often describe unusual beeping or pulsing noises, which some researchers speculate may be part of an advanced binary communication system.

Electromagnetic signals associated with UFOs can disrupt electronic devices, suggesting these phenomena might involve complex wave transmissions. Such signals—whether light pulses, sound, or radio frequencies—could carry binary data, further supporting the idea that these craft use binary as a “universal” method of communication or control.