Jim Semivan Abduction Incident (1990)

In an interview posted on the Engaging The Phenomenon channel, Jim Semivan, a former member of the CIA’s National Clandestine Service, shared insights into his career and his personal encounters with the phenomenon of nonhuman intelligences. Semivan, who retired from the CIA in 2007 after a 25-year career, held multiple overseas and domestic tours, including senior management positions at the CIA headquarters. He is a recipient of the agency’s Career Intelligence Medal and later co-founded To The Stars, where he serves as Vice President of Operations.

Jim Semivan also revealed himself as an experiencer, recounting a profound and unsettling interaction he and his wife had with the phenomenon. Semivan prefers to describe this event as an “experience” rather than an “abduction,” although he acknowledges that others might use different terms. This encounter involved a nighttime visitation, resulting in physical marks on Semivan’s body and significant aftereffects for his wife. The phenomenon continued for a year or two, accompanied by poltergeist activity in their home in Alexandria, Virginia, an area with historical significance as both a Civil War and Native American encampment.

Semivan mentioned that the impact of these experiences profoundly altered their lives, a reaction he likens to what Robert Hastings, author of “UFOs and Nukes,” calls the “M response.” Despite the intensity of the event and its aftermath, Semivan noted the challenge of processing and sharing such experiences, leaving a lingering sense of bewilderment and introspection.

Robert Hastings term “M response” specifically refers to the mysterious malfunctions and disruptions in nuclear missile systems that have coincided with sightings of UFOs near these sites.

In 2014, Jim Semivan attended a non-UFO-related conference where he encountered John Alexander. This meeting led to an interview with both Jim and his wife, subsequently connecting them with a Life Sciences Exploration (LSE) program and other entities interested in their experiences. Following this, their involvement deepened, leading to the collection of their blood samples, medical records, and DNA for ongoing study. Semivan revealed that they are still part of a cohort being examined, indicating that more details might emerge over time.

During a CIA session around 1992 or 1993, Semivan met with high-clearance individuals who spent hours debriefing him about his experiences with nonhuman intelligences. This interaction included a revelation about the entities he had encountered, which were not the typical “Greys.” These beings were described to Semivan by the CIA personnel, who possessed extensive knowledge about such phenomena. This disclosure marked a turning point in Semivan’s understanding of the UFO phenomenon and its implications.

Semivan’s personal encounters with these entities were not just physical but also involved significant poltergeist activity in his home in Alexandria, Virginia. These experiences were so profound that they led to his involvement with figures like Lou Elizondo and the AATIP program, where he served as an unofficial consultant for a few years. Throughout this period, Semivan was exposed to both classified and unclassified information, shaping his perspective on the reality and complexity of the phenomenon.

Despite his optimism and belief that the phenomenon does not pose an existential threat, Semivan acknowledged a lingering sense of uncertainty and potential negativity associated with these encounters. He referred to the insights of Jacques Vallée, who described the phenomenon as indifferent, and noted that many experiencers, despite initial fear, eventually view their encounters as transformative. However, Semivan personally regards his experience as a human rights violation due to the adverse impact on him and his wife, suggesting a possible sinister element.

Jim Semivan discussed Melinda Leslie’s accounts of military abductions, also known as MILABs, which he finds believable and compelling. Although some might dismiss such stories, Semivan considers all possibilities open. His personal experiences differed, as he described his interactions with nonhuman intelligences as positive and caring, though he remains cautious, acknowledging the advanced nature of these entities might involve manipulation. He emphasized the need for openness and collective effort in understanding these phenomena, as secrecy hampers progress.

As reported, individuals who have experienced alien abductions are sometimes subsequently abducted by military personnel. These military abductions often involve interrogation, drugging, hypnosis, and mind control, aiming to gather information about the extraterrestrials’ motives, medical experiments, and technologies.

Jim Semivan shared a revealing conversation he had with Lou Elizondo, where Elizondo drew a Venn diagram illustrating that the UFO phenomenon might reside at the intersection of consciousness and quantum theory, areas we understand little about. This implies a universal consciousness and immaterial nature of our existence. Semivan pondered how a president could explain such concepts to the public without causing widespread fear, given the entities’ abilities to manipulate reality and the potential for societal and economic disruption. He acknowledged the complexities and ethical dilemmas involved in government secrecy, suggesting that while some believe it’s necessary for national security, others argue it’s a moral right to know the truth. Semivan highlighted the challenge Congress faces in addressing these issues, including legal constraints and the potential consequences of disclosure. He stressed the importance of international collaboration and private research, as government capabilities alone are insufficient to fully understand and manage the phenomenon.

Jim Semivan emphasized the necessity of open disclosure and confirmation of the UFO phenomenon, arguing that the government’s siloed and compartmentalized approach hinders progress. He mentioned that within the programs, security measures are so stringent that they often hit brick walls, preventing further advancements. Semivan highlighted that the public’s perceived lack of understanding might be due to being held back by this secrecy. He acknowledged that immediate disclosure in the 1940s would have likely caused chaos, but gradual public acclimation to this information could have significantly advanced human evolution and understanding.

Semivan pointed out that the phenomenon itself might be a barrier to disclosure, as it remains unpredictable and elusive, providing no definitive answers or proof. This has led to frustration and mistrust towards the government, although Semivan suggests that the phenomenon’s nature is more to blame for the lack of transparency.

Jim Semivan looked into the potential agreements between non-human intelligences and terrestrial governments. He believes such agreements are plausible and has encountered information suggesting their existence to some extent. This idea raises numerous questions about the nature and purpose of these interactions, and whether these intelligences are directing events and communication. Semivan discussed the behavioral reinforcement theory proposed by Jacques Vallée, where repeated exposure to a concept, like introducing broccoli to children, eventually leads to acceptance.

Semivan’s reflections underscore the intricate balance between secrecy and disclosure, the ethical and moral dilemmas involved, and the profound impact of such knowledge on human society. He highlighted that while disclosure advocates push for transparency, the actual handling of this information requires careful consideration of its far-reaching implications.

Jim Semivan discussed the concept of the “Invisible College,” a term coined by Jacques Vallée to describe informal networks of government and intelligence community members who discuss UFO phenomena. He mentioned that at one point, the intelligence community had a classified communication string dedicated to this topic, where officials could talk about UFOs without sharing classified information. Semivan highlighted the different perspectives within these circles: some believe disclosure is necessary for the public good, while others, with a broader view, argue for continued secrecy due to the complexity and potential implications of the information.

He pointed out that trust in the decision-makers who control this information is crucial, as these decisions are made by high-level officials confirmed by the president and Congress. Semivan acknowledged that historical examples like MK Ultra have shown that government agencies can sometimes act against public interest, leading to increased oversight and legal review in intelligence operations.

Semivan also reflected on the challenges whistleblowers face, noting that while some like David Grusch have come forward with credible information, others remain anonymous, complicating the narrative. He emphasized the need for a balanced approach to secrecy and disclosure, considering both ethical and practical implications. Semivan concluded by expressing hope for more transparency and collaboration in understanding and addressing the UFO phenomenon.

Jim Semivan discusses the unpredictability of a major revelation, whether by the phenomenon itself or government disclosure. He explains how, in the intelligence community, information is gathered systematically through various methods, including human intelligence, to build a comprehensive picture. This approach is now being applied to the study of UFOs, with more scientists and social scientists getting involved, leading to a growing body of data and understanding.

On the topic of Havana syndrome, Semivan confirms it is a terrestrial issue, potentially linked to hostile state or non-state actors, and not directly related to UAP technology. He shares his own experience with similar symptoms in the 1980s, suggesting the technology has been around for a long time and can be developed with off-the-shelf components, making it dangerous and difficult to address.

When discussing potential access to UFO legacy programs by figures like Sean Kirkpatrick, Semivan is uncertain but suggests there are indications both for and against such access. He also touches on historical incidents like the Starfish Prime nuclear test, which some believe was an attempt to down a UAP using EMP.

Semivan discusses the potential interactions and agreements between non-human intelligences and terrestrial governments. Jim Semivan shares his belief that it is possible, based on certain information, that such agreements might exist, raising numerous questions about what these entities want and how they might be directing traffic. He suggests that non-human intelligences might be introducing concepts to humanity in a way akin to behavioral psychology techniques, gradually getting people used to new ideas.

He touches on the limitations of science in addressing these phenomena and the necessity of a broader, perhaps more philosophical or spiritual, approach to understanding the nature of reality.

The interview also looked into the role of figures like Lou Elizondo and Chris Mellon in bringing UFO issues to Congress and the public. Their efforts have been pivotal in legitimizing the topic and pushing for greater transparency, despite the inherent challenges and resistance within the government.