Albert Einstein UFO Connection

In 1993, Shirley Jean Wright made a startling admission that she had accompanied her mentor, Albert Einstein, to Roswell, New Mexico, in July 1947. According to her, they were invited by the federal government to examine the wreckage of a crashed UFO and the bodies of its alien occupants. This claim, made in recordings released posthumously.

Keep in mind, on July 8, 1947, a press release from the Roswell Army Air Field (RAAF) announced that they had recovered a “flying disc” from a nearby ranch.

Dr. Shirley Jean Wright was a remarkable figure whose academic pursuits were as intriguing as her later claims regarding extraterrestrial phenomena. Her master’s thesis, titled “The Solvolysis of Butyl Bromide in Methanol-Water Mixtures,” submitted to the University of Miami in July 1955, demonstrates her dedication to the field of chemistry. This research explored the solvolysis reactions, which involve the breakdown of molecules in the presence of a solvent, in this case, butyl bromide in a methanol-water mixture. Her work contributed valuable insights into the kinetics and mechanisms of chemical reactions, highlighting her meticulous approach and analytical skills.

Dr. Shirley Wright’s claims are hard to ignore, especially in light of our current understanding that non-human intelligences (NHI) and UFOs are real. If it weren’t for this shift in perspective, her testimony would not matter in 2024. However, given the evolving discourse on the phenomena, her account gains significant relevance.

What makes Dr. Wright’s testimony particularly credible is the fact that she had no desire for fame or financial gain. The recordings of her confession, which detail her journey with Albert Einstein to Roswell in 1947 to investigate a crashed UFO and its alien occupants, were only made public after her death. This timing suggests she had no ulterior motive. Given today’s acknowledgment of UFOs and NHIs, Dr. Wright’s account offers valuable insights that align with our current understanding.

In a taped confession from 1993, Dr. Shirley Wright, who was an assistant to Albert Einstein in the summer of 1947, made the extraordinary claim that she and Einstein were flown to Roswell, New Mexico, under government orders to examine the wreckage and bodies from a crashed extraterrestrial vehicle. These recordings, made by UFO researcher Sheila Franklin, were kept private for decades. The tapes were eventually located and shared by Franklin, who had interviewed Wright about the incident. The confession remained largely unknown until it was released to the public in October-November 2021. Franklin, who had initially recorded Wright’s testimony in Miami, Florida, provided the tapes after significant effort to locate them nearly thirty years later.

Wright began by explaining that she was selected from a group of gifted students to work with Einstein due to her expertise in nuclear chemistry. She described how they were flown from Princeton to a southwestern army air base under strict security clearances, which were deactivated immediately after their visit. They were taken to a heavily guarded hangar where the wreckage of the disc-shaped craft and several alien bodies were being examined.

The aliens, according to Wright, were about five feet tall, hairless, with large heads, and grayish-green skin. They had no noses but had markings where noses would be, large dark eyes without visible pupils, and slim bodies. The beings wore suits made of a fabric unrecognized by Wright, even with her background in chemistry. The suits had no visible fasteners and included an insignia placed centrally on their chests.

Wright recounted that one alien was still alive and in pain during their visit. This creature was described as more human-like and grotesquely expanded in its torso. The aliens communicated their interest in having continued contact with Earth, although they found humans very odd and had almost discounted Earth as a desirable place to visit.

Throughout the interview, Wright emphasized the cautious and limited nature of the aliens’ disclosures about their lifestyle and reproduction. They seemed to live in subterranean environments and were very careful about what they revealed. Despite their initial interest, the aliens did not seem to see Earth as a suitable place for ongoing interaction.

This confession, kept private for decades and released only in the early 2020s, provides a detailed and compelling account of Wright’s and Einstein’s experience with extraterrestrial life at Roswell. It aligns with historical records of the Roswell incident.

Then next in June 1947, a remarkable draft document titled “Relationships with Inhabitants of Celestial Bodies” was co-authored by two of the most significant scientific figures of the 20th century, Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer and Professor Albert Einstein. This document, housed at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, explores the implications of encountering intelligent extraterrestrial life and the profound legal and political ramifications such an encounter would entail.

Robert Oppenheimer and Albert Einstein both worked at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, in 1947. Oppenheimer was the director of the Institute from 1947 to 1966, while Einstein had been a member of the Institute since its inception in 1933.

The document begins by stating that interactions with extraterrestrial beings would not pose fundamentally new problems from the standpoint of international law. However, it acknowledges that the unique nature of such intelligent beings would introduce unprecedented challenges. The core issue lies in establishing the principles upon which these relationships would be based, particularly the need for a shared method of communication and a mutual psychological understanding.

Oppenheimer and Einstein proposed the creation of a new branch of law, tentatively named “Law Among Planetary Peoples.” This new legal framework would be essential to accommodate the unique circumstances posed by extraterrestrial interactions. They argued that if extraterrestrial beings possessed a culture and political organization, they should be recognized as independent and sovereign peoples. The establishment of legal regulations for future relationships would require mutual agreements and possibly the acceptance of many extraterrestrial principles.

The document also looked into scenarios where extraterrestrial entities might pose a threat to Earth. It argues that legitimate defense would be justified only to the extent necessary to neutralize the danger. Moreover, if extraterrestrial beings sought to settle on Earth, their political and cultural similarities to humans would determine their recognition as independent peoples.

Another intriguing aspect of the document is the discussion of the legal status of celestial bodies, such as the Moon and Mars. It speculates on the possibility of independent human-like civilizations existing on these celestial bodies. They explore the concept of “res nullius,” territories that belong to no one, and how this concept might apply to celestial bodies if extraterrestrial civilizations were discovered there.

The document concludes with a discussion on the potential connection between atomic testing on Earth and the presence of unidentified space vehicles in our atmosphere. It posits that the testing of atomic weapons might have attracted extraterrestrial scrutiny, possibly due to concerns over such destructive activities.

In their professional opinion, Oppenheimer and Einstein emphasized the perilous nature of the situation and the urgent need for measures to address the potential threats posed by unidentified space vehicles. The document reflects their deep concern about the intersection of advanced technology, international security, and the unknown capabilities of extraterrestrial civilizations.

The “Relationships with Inhabitants of Celestial Bodies” document provides a fascinating glimpse into the minds of two of history’s greatest scientists as they grappled with the profound implications of extraterrestrial contact. It highlights their forward-thinking approach and the necessity of adapting our legal and political frameworks to accommodate new realities.